I'm not trying to discredit your professor, but I think you should write however you want.
You can write stock picking commentary if you want, but do it your way.
A good story is way more fun to read than just a bunch of numbers. While insightful, nobody likes to read a textbook.
Data won't keep people coming back to your articles, but your opinion will. As a writer myself, I took a while to understand this, and I've had much more success and fun with it.
Good employers recognize talent no matter what. Just stay true to your own voice.
Adding more assumptions doesn't make something "analysis". Muted.
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/764703716217323540/942265869264900106/vocodes_eddae000-0d03-4ad8-95b9-1a6bf2a9cabf.wav
I'm not trying to discredit your professor, but I think you should write however you want.
You can write stock picking commentary if you want, but do it your way.
A good story is way more fun to read than just a bunch of numbers. While insightful, nobody likes to read a textbook.
Data won't keep people coming back to your articles, but your opinion will. As a writer myself, I took a while to understand this, and I've had much more success and fun with it.
Good employers recognize talent no matter what. Just stay true to your own voice.
Cincinnati native here, so go Bengals indeed!